雅思大作文范文：是否该雇佣相同数量的男女员工

现在，一些工作场所正在招收同等数量的男性和女性，你认为这种做法如何，今天聚培训小编就给大家介绍下雅思大作文范文：是否该雇佣相同数量的男女员工。

　　题目：

Nowadays, some workplaces tend to employ equal numbers of men and women workers. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

现在一些工作场所努力雇佣同等数量的男性和女性。你认为这是积极的还是消极的现象？

　　9分：

　　应该分配：

1. 这是对于女性的一种补偿和鼓励，让她们能够在任何岗位中锻炼和证明自己，也是对女性的一种解放和尊重。

2. 女性的加入是一种润滑剂，她们性格温柔，有耐心和弹性，能有效化解员工之间的矛盾。

3. 女性的加入能增加男女之间的相互了解和相互学习，培养了真正的社交能力。

　　不应该分配：

1. 这是一种女权主义泛滥的表现，这会导致原来那种“以能力为中心“的人才选拔标准的坍塌。结果是，我们招聘到的女性很可能工作能力和动力都不足。

2. 男女之间天然会产生吸引，这种恋爱关系会分散员工的工作关注度。

3. 有些工作不适合女性，如消防，海上救生，特种部队，它们对员工的生理强壮有较高要求，女性无法承担。

　　重点提纲2：

1. 诚然，强行要求每一个工种都男女职员数量均等是毫无道理的。首先，有些工作很强调生理的强壮，比如说士兵和消防员，它们就不适合女性。如果要求这些职员招聘大量的女性员工，则会产生混乱。举例，如果军队中有一半是女性，则部队的战斗力会严重下降，因为可能有一半的士兵无法完成繁重的行军任务，在战场上，她们甚至会哭泣，逃跑，这大大降低了部队士气。

2. 女性生理上的改变会带来工作上的不确定。举例，如果公司有一半的岗位都是给女性的话，则因为女员工怀孕而请假去看医生的事件会不断发生，这导致了大量工作的停滞。

3. 但是，一个男女均衡的工作环境能产生很多好处。首先，工作气氛会更和谐，因为无论男女，在面对异性的时候，他们总是表现的更有教养，这意味着员工之间的争吵会减少。第二，这能实现一种性格互补，并充分发挥他们的性格优势，举例，男性更加的果断和有决心，而女性更加的细心和耐心，他们的合作一定能带来全面的，明智的决定。第三，这能欢迎女性加入工作和影响社会，充分体现女性的价值。

　　9分范文1：

Under a long-time view of women being mistreated, many so-called female-liberation suggests come into being, and one of them is that certain amount of social high-level positions should be only for women. In my opinion, this issue is partially reasonable.

On one hand, women can prove their competence in leadership of certain industries. In terms of the fact that most of public services including hospital, rest home, baby-care center, school education, tourism and retail industries, females have been massively employed as the main force for working, the introduction of female leaders into leadship positions is necessary, like managers, directors and executives, because the gender coherence between the superior and the subordinate can minimize misunderstandings and conflicts in group. For example, female leaders can naturally understand and be familiar with practical difficulties and challenges of vast basic-level employees, such as physical changes, pregnancy, and personal health care, as well as play a role of soul partner by intimately listening to and talking with their emotional discomforts. Therefore, in these industries mainly consisting of women, female leaders have huge advantages to build up a smooth and harmonious working atmosphere, and encourage workers to be more productive and loyal.

On the other hand, this issue is inherently problematic because it grants women some political previliges. At present, general cooperate cultures are open and inclusive(无男女性别歧视的)，with no discrimination against females on purpose. In other words, for a company, core standards of measuring whether a person is fit for a high-level job primarily depend on working abilities and experience, educaion, personalities, talents and interpersonal skills. Sex, however, is least important and often ignored. Therefore, it is very ridiculous and even risky to force companies to label certain number of senior jobs as" only for women", because in a job interview, a mediorce woman with political mercy can easily defeat male candidates, no matter how talented or enthusiastic the latters are. Obviously, the shift of leader-selecting policy from talent-orientedness to gender-centeredness is considerably unfair, it would destroy the positive competitive mechanism among employess and quell the passion and motivation of males in job, finally. Moreover, in the level of business development, the leadership team might miss right new male leaders who have real competence and ambition and ability to make sound plans and desicions.

In conclusion, this measure is unwise. Although it can enhance the productivity of female-dominated business, its destructive effects on talent-selecting system might should never be overlooked, for the reason that it will largely lower overall morale of workers, and even make a company's running on the vedge of collapse due to the lack of proper leaders.

　　9分范文2:

In centuries, there is always an imbalance between genders in social employment. Some analysts argue that it is impossible to eliminate the underrepresentation of women in job markets, while others propose that women should be entitled the same opportunity to be engaged in a position. The essay will compare these two opinions before giving my own opinion.

Admittedly, the practice that equal numbers of male and female workers should be employed is unreasonable. Firstly, there is no denying that certain kinds of positions like soldiers and firefighters requiring strength and endurance are unsuitable for women featuring physical and psychological weakness. For example, if the half proportion of jobs in army is occupied by females, its combat capability and morale might be unstable and easily affected by unexpected movements of females, such as weeping, escaping and fainting, because women are physically and mentally vulnerable to the stress, fears and dangers in battlefield. Secondly, physical changes of females also bring uncertain risks to the work. For example, a woman in pregnancy has to frequently visit a doctor or take health-care diagnosis in hospital. If a half staff of a company are females, then many job positions will encounter with the unpredicted leaves and absences of pregnant female workers, thus leading a whole company into the disorder.

Opponents of this issue hold that the positive aspects of the practice are more influential. First of all, employing equal numbers of male and female workers can help create positive working environment, for it is usually the case that men or women perform less aggressive in the face of the opposite gender. Second, there is a large possibility that men and women workers bring their respective talents into full play since men are more determined and less likely to be affected by external influence and women are generally more careful and patient. Finally, the move could be regarded as a sign of equality, for in many workplaces, employers used to limit the numbers of women workers and welcome a substantial percentage of males to join them. The practice that equal numbers of men and women workers are accepted indicates the realization of women’s value.

To sum up, it does bring drawbacks to some workplaces if equal numbers of men and women workers are employed, but this cannot deny the benefits of the practice. This essay is inclined to maintain that equal numbers of male and female workers can be employed in the same workplace given that there is a rational division of labor, with all employees developing their own particular advantages for mutual benefits.

【结构与思路】

本文可以写成双边结构，正文前半部分讲男女平等的必要性，很多工作的确女性的比例太少，是一种性别歧视。正文后半部分讲这种做法的缺点，如有些体力劳动较多的工作可能更适合男性，而有些工作反而更适合女性，没必要刻意去进行平衡。

Introduction：

1. 背景： 性别平等的话题已经被热议了几十年。The issue of gender equality has been discussed fervently in the past few decades.

2. 主题：然而，一些人，尤其是一些女权主义者feminists 提出，为了表示对女性的尊重，公司应当雇佣相同数量的男女员工。

3.观点：我的观点是，每家公司应该根据工作的性质nature of work来决定所录用男女的比例。

II. Body 1：男女员工数量相同的优点

传统的社会观念social convention认为女性要比男性低一等women are inferior to their male counterparts，因此女孩从小就不被鼓励做一些诸如政治、商务等工作and therefore most girls are not encouraged to pursue political office, business success and professional prestige. 但是，男性掌握这些工作未必意味着他们就擅长这些工作。However, the fact that men hold these jobs does not necessarily mean that they are good at what they do. 如果公司雇佣同等数量的男女员工，那么女性将拥有平等的工作权，以及和男性竞争的机会Women can enjoy the equal right to work, and the right to compete with men.

III. Body 2：男女员工数量相同的缺点

1论点：而如果公司盲目地追求性别平等pursue gender equality blindly，那么男性和女性可能不能发挥自己的专长bring their talents in certain fields into full play.

论据：由于男女的基因构成上的差异Due to the disparity in genetic makeup，男女适合的工作不同。男性由于更加活跃active, 精力充沛energetic和好胜aggressive，所以有些体力劳动manual labour更加适合男性，比如矿工miners，水手sailors，消防员fire fighters，铁匠ironsmith，甚至屠夫butchers。而女性由于更加仔细careful, 耐心patient, 没有野心less ambitious, 因此一些家政类的domestic, 护理类的caring, 秘书类的secretarial工作更加适合女性来完成。

2. 论点：这种做法不但不会解决性别歧视sexism，可能反而更加加剧。Moreover, the problem of sexism would be worsened instead of being overcome.

论据：如果男女被迫去做自己不擅长的工作，很难去和异性竞争they will have great difficulty competing with the opposite sex. 他们在工作上会落后They will fall behind甚至被看不起be looked down upon.

IV. Conclusion

1. 重申观点： 聘用相同数量的男女员工，虽然似乎尊重了女性的工作权right to work，但是有可能反而导致不公平inequality和性别歧视sex discrimination.

2. 提出建议： 公司不应当过度强调男女员工在数量上的平等，而是根据工作的不同性质来决定男女员工的比例。

5.5分：

男女员工数量相同的优点：1. 在正常情况下，女性和男性一样有能力，如果很多杰出的女性参与到社会竞争中，社会就会被加强。2. 能够提高女性的社会地位。十年前，

中国的大多数女性没有工作和收入，社会地位很低。而现在，女性参与到工作中，贡献自己的力量，社会地位就提升了。

缺点：字数不够，论述不充分

In my opinion,the trend to hire equal numbers of male and female workers is quite positive.

First of all.The majority of women are as capable as men in normal circumstances hence the society will be enhanced on account of lots of excellent women workers are participating in social competition.For instance.Mothers seldom went to work in the old days of China but now they do.Those powerful women have been taking care of lots of tiny things which had been ignoring by insensitive man for a significantly long time.Companies functions well because of this.

The second.Hiring equal figures of work stuffs of both sex can effectively improve social status of women in China which will be a vital improvement for Chinese society.For example ,most of women had no job and no income as well ten years ago in China and that was a main limitation which kept women out of making essential contributions to the nation and then led to have a lower status.The situation is much more different from the past.Nowadays ,women are making contributions and bringing profits to society as well and their social status are dramatically changed subsequently

All in all.Giving equal chances to both male and female is a great phenomenon.At least it would make a big difference in China.

以上就是关于雅思大作文范文：是否该雇佣相同数量的男女员工的详细内容，希望大家能从中受益，不断改进自己的备考方法提升备考效率，从而获得满意的成绩。更多备考信息请登录聚培训考试网站或拨打聚培训考试热线咨询，祝大家都能早日梦圆名校。