导读:10月29日的雅思考试已经结束了,聚培训雅思栏目为大家整理10月29雅思考试经济类题材大作文范文,希望对大家有所帮助!Task:Is it a good thing for the senior managers to have better salaries than other workers in a company or organization?To what extent do you agree or disagree?Sample answer:If Karl Marx was still alive in the word, chances are that he wo
10月29日的雅思考试已经结束了,聚培训雅思栏目为大家整理10月29雅思考试经济类题材大作文范文,希望对大家有所帮助!
Task:Is it a good thing for the senior managers to have better salaries than other workers in a company or organization?To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample answer:
If Karl Marx was still alive in the word, chances are that he would frown upon the widening disparity between the well-paid senior staff, who are in charge of lifeblood of the company and other workers who are heavily exploited of the view that the salary should be in line with the hierarchy of staff in their companies.
The staff who are in the relatively high level in companies assume more accountability of the operation of companies, which justifies the status qua that are supposed to be better rewarded. The senior members' responsibilities do not only confine in the office trifles such as printing the files for the meeting, or work out a balance sheet for the financial quarter. Instead, they are under the massive pressure to be insightful policy makers who are seemingly at ease with daunting tasks, because one of the their minor mistakes is likely to trigger a blunder, bringing inevitable financial loss to their companies.
On the other hand, the high salary of the senior staff can also serve as incentive to their subordinates. Monetary reward, materialistic as it might be, can stir more motivation of staff, because it is a conspicuous fact that a decent salary is the foundation of the daily life. With the seductive payback, workers are more willing to fulfill their duties with higher quality and the talent of the able would be fully tapped to the benefit for companies and themselves.
Of course, the dark sides cannot be neglected due to its advantages the high salary brings. Certain senior members share the lion’s share of benefit and the rest of it is then allocated to majority of junior employees. This income gap is a dormant factor that can damage the rapport of the members and undermine the overall moral and collaboration of different levels of staff.
In conclusion, the principle of “no pain no gain” still works as a maxim in the modern companies. Egalitarianism is only a Utopian depiction, while utilitarianism has the final say.
(335 words)